ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Anxiety and Intimate Partner Violence.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Prevention and Screening, Family Medicine Workforce, Navigating Systems, and Improving Patient Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriodic universal screening for anxiety and for intimate partner violence (IPV) for women and adolescent girls are national clinical practice recommendations. However, screening rates in primary care settings are low. This study aimed to increase awareness and adoption of screening for anxiety and for IPV in women and adolescent girls by identifying screening barriers and facilitators to inform clinical resource development.
methodsTwo-phase, qualitative study using semistructured interviews to identify screening barriers and facilitators; thematic analysis of interview data using a rapid evaluation approach.
resultsTwenty-seven clinicians and staff members were interviewed in 12 clinics in 2 primary care networks in Oregon. All participants recognized the importance of screening in primary care settings but were generally unaware of screening recommendations and insurance coverage and were unsure of their clinic's policies and practices, citing a lack of protocols for referrals for positive screens. Barriers to both anxiety and IPV screening included screening fatigue, lack of metrics, uncertain documentation and reporting, and unclear referral and follow-up procedures. For IPV screening specifically, barriers included discomfort with screening, privacy concerns, and perceived low occurrence. Facilitators for both services included leveraging existing screening practices and electronic health record tools, and clear recommendations for universal screening best practices.
conclusionImplementation of routine screening for anxiety and IPV in women and adolescents in primary care is low but may improve with targeted clinician resources and education. Workflow diagrams and resource guides responsive to identified screening barriers and facilitators, including clarification of insurance coverage for preventive services, and resources to support implementation of protocols of screening methods, clinical documentation, and referrals for anxiety and IPV in primary care settings, could improve screening practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.