Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698783›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2026

Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Anxiety and Intimate Partner Violence.

Amy G Cantor, Chrystal Barnes, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman, Tamar Wyte-Lake, Miranda Pappas, Keeley Blackie, Heidi D Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy G CantorFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN). cantor@ohsu.edu.
Chrystal BarnesFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).
Sonja Likumahuwa-AckmanFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).
Tamar Wyte-LakeFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).
Miranda PappasFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).
Keeley BlackieFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).
Heidi D NelsonFrom the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriodic universal screening for anxiety and for intimate partner violence (IPV) for women and adolescent girls are national clinical practice recommendations. However, screening rates in primary care settings are low. This study aimed to increase awareness and adoption of screening for anxiety and for IPV in women and adolescent girls by identifying screening barriers and facilitators to inform clinical resource development.

methodsTwo-phase, qualitative study using semistructured interviews to identify screening barriers and facilitators; thematic analysis of interview data using a rapid evaluation approach.

resultsTwenty-seven clinicians and staff members were interviewed in 12 clinics in 2 primary care networks in Oregon. All participants recognized the importance of screening in primary care settings but were generally unaware of screening recommendations and insurance coverage and were unsure of their clinic's policies and practices, citing a lack of protocols for referrals for positive screens. Barriers to both anxiety and IPV screening included screening fatigue, lack of metrics, uncertain documentation and reporting, and unclear referral and follow-up procedures. For IPV screening specifically, barriers included discomfort with screening, privacy concerns, and perceived low occurrence. Facilitators for both services included leveraging existing screening practices and electronic health record tools, and clear recommendations for universal screening best practices.

conclusionImplementation of routine screening for anxiety and IPV in women and adolescents in primary care is low but may improve with targeted clinician resources and education. Workflow diagrams and resource guides responsive to identified screening barriers and facilitators, including clarification of insurance coverage for preventive services, and resources to support implementation of protocols of screening methods, clinical documentation, and referrals for anxiety and IPV in primary care settings, could improve screening practices.

Indexed as

AnxietyIntimate Partner ViolenceMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageInterviews as TopicOregonQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationWorkflowYoung AdultAnxietyHealth PolicyInsurance CoverageInterpersonal ViolenceIntimate Partner ViolenceMental HealthOregonPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID41698783
PMCPMC12978763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.