Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698755›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

Decision-making considerations for single-dose HPV vaccination, including drivers of schedule adoption or switch: insights from immunisation stakeholders in 19 low-income and middle-income countries.

Erica N Rosser, Ishani Sheth, Megan D Wysong, Sunny Roy, Casey Geddes, Rupali J Limaye, Joseph G Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica N RosserDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ishani ShethDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Megan D WysongDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sunny RoyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Casey GeddesDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joseph G RosenDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA jrosen72@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-4033

Funding

The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-046461the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-057603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmerging evidence of durable immunogenicity from mono-dose human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) prompted the WHO to recommend a single-dose HPVV schedule in December 2022. There is, however, limited understanding of processes and considerations influencing country adoption of the updated HPVV dosing schedule recommendation.

methodsWe identified four archetypes characterising countries' progress along the HPVV introduction and single-dose adoption continua. From September 2023 to February 2024, we purposefully sampled and conducted semistructured interviews with immunisation stakeholders representing Ministries of Health, Gavi-funded technical assistance partners, civil society organisations and multilateral agencies from African and Asian low-income and middle-income countries. Using multicycle, iterative thematic analysis, we identified factors enabling the adoption of the HPVV single-dose recommendation, as well as constraints to rendering a decision on the HPVV dosing schedule.

resultsWe interviewed 66 stakeholders across 19 countries with mature HPVV programmes (n=11) or forthcoming national HPVV introductions (n=8), as well as countries adopting (n=10) or undecided about (n=9) the single-dose schedule. Stakeholders conveyed enthusiasm for single-dose HPVV, citing the following anticipated benefits: higher HPVV schedule completion and coverage, especially in underimmunised populations; costs saved from operational reconfigurations and reduced vaccine procurement demands, particularly for countries transitioning out of Gavi co-financing in a vaccine supply-constrained environment; and optimised vaccine stock management capacity, importantly for countries pursuing new vaccine introductions for multiple antigens simultaneously. Factors demotivating HPVV single-dose schedule adoption or delaying decision-making included: limited localised evidence of long-term immunologic protection from single-dose HPVV; off-label product use liabilities; costs/resources required for retraining the health workforce in countries with mature HPVV programmes; and potential for widening HPVV coverage inequities, notably in countries with elevated HIV burdens.

conclusionsCoupled with the WHO's endorsement, the perceived benefits of single-dose HPVV consistently outweighed the anticipated risks, even when these risks delayed country-level HPVV schedule-related decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDeveloping CountriesImmunization ProgramsImmunization SchedulePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationHumansPapillomavirus VaccinesDecision MakingGlobal HealthPublic HealthQualitative studyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID41698755
PMCPMC12911718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.