ArticleBMJ open2026
Economic information in clinical decision-making: focus group discussions with Finnish general practitioners and patients.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study the factors that influence physicians' and patients' use of, and willingness to use, economic information in clinical decision-making, and examine physicians' views on whether clinical practice guidelines can support its use.
designSemistructured focus group discussions with an inductive content analysis.
settingFinnish health centre general practitioners (GPs) and adult patient representatives, five groups of each.
participants22 GPs and 15 patient representatives.
resultsIn the GP groups, five factors involved in using economic information in clinical decisions were raised: the issue of who pays, knowledge about cost information, the cost-benefit ratio of treatments, care planning and health economic understanding. Concerning the inclusion of economic information in clinical guidelines, GPs raised themes including the content and means of presentation of economic information, and advantages and challenges related to the integration of economic information into clinical guidelines. In the patient groups, the identified themes related to seeing the costs of treatments, the organisation of healthcare services, inclusion of cost information in clinical guidelines, patient information and support, and cost containment in healthcare.
conclusionsThe study suggests that GPs and patients are willing to use economic information in clinical decision making. It also implies a need for easily accessible and understandable economic information, and that clinical guidelines may be a good way to support this. In addition, the study highlights the need for education on the economic aspects of healthcare for physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.