ArticleAcademic pediatrics2026
Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Academic pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suicidal ideation after stroke: why standardized screening is essential for community-based prediction models.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUniversal suicide risk screening in pediatric primary care settings is lacking, despite the endorsement of this practice by several national organizations. This study explores barriers to and facilitators of implementing universal suicide risk screening in pediatric primary care clinics, with a focus on clinics that had not yet adopted this practice.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study consisting of semistructured interviews with primary care clinicians and support staff involved in suicide risk screening, risk assessment, and disposition planning. Participants were recruited from 15 pediatric clinics in the Midwestern United States. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsFrom 55 interviews, we identified barriers at 3 levels: clinic, provider, and patient. Clinic-level barriers included time, workflow, and staffing. Provider-level barriers included lack of training/self-efficacy, frustration at not being able to offer solutions, and burnout. Patient-level barriers included irritation with repetitiveness of screening questions, concerns about honesty and openness, parent/caregiver buy-in, and discomfort and stigma in discussing the topic of suicide. Facilitators included perceived value and effectiveness of screening, comfort with screening, clinic buy-in, a team approach to care, providing privacy, and providing context. Suggestions to enhance these suicide prevention practices were also described.
conclusionsOverall, clinicians and support staff reported seeing value in implementing suicide risk screening in pediatric primary care. Our findings underscore the importance of reducing barriers and enhancing facilitators associated with implementing suicide risk screening, risk assessment, and disposition planning to expand suicide prevention efforts to more youths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.