ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
A Novel Fibroblast Activation Protein-Based Algorithm to Assess Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction to "Novel Small Molecule-Derived, Highly Selective Substrates for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)".ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive fibrosis testing is crucial for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) management. This study evaluated a marker of activated mesenchymal fibrogenic cells, circulating fibroblast activation protein (cFAP), in a novel diagnostic algorithm, FAP Index, for patients with MASLD.
methodsTwo retrospective cohorts recruited from tertiary hepatology clinics were studied as training (n = 160) and external validation cohorts (n = 332), with prevalence of histologic advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) of 20% and 11%, respectively. cFAP was measured using our rapid single-step FAP-specific microplate enzyme assay. A predictive model, FAP Index, containing age, type 2 diabetes, alanine transaminase, and ordinal cFAP was developed using logistic regression; then, its diagnostic accuracy was evaluated.
resultsFAP Index AUROC for advanced fibrosis was 0.875 (95% CI: 0.813-0.938) in the training cohort and 0.841 (95% CI: 0.776-0.906) in the validation cohort. Low cutoff 0.157 (sensitivity 84.3%, negative predictive value 95%) and high cutoff 0.695 (specificity 99.2%, positive predictive value 92.9%) values excluded and predicted advanced fibrosis, respectively. FAP Index following FIB-4 reduced the frequency of indeterminate results by more than one-third compared to FIB-4 alone. FAP Index following NFS (NAFLD Fibrosis Score) reduced the frequency of indeterminate results by ~70% compared to NFS alone.
conclusionWithout a need for elastography, applying FAP Index following FIB-4 or NFS can facilitate accurate risk stratification of patients by greatly reducing the frequency of indeterminate results compared to FIB-4 or NFS alone, without compromising negative predictive value. Thus, FAP Index is a novel, fibrogenesis-relevant, rapid, robust diagnostic tool suited to increasing the efficiency of liver fibrosis triage in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.