ArticleAddictive behaviors2026
Cannabis modalities matter for momentary subjective drug effects.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeModes of cannabis use, or modalities, have been linked to both concurrent and longitudinal outcomes as modes may influence individuals' subjective experiences. However, the existing literature relies predominantly on experimental studies, observational surveys, and daily diary methods. The present study aimed to address this gap by using intensive repeated assessment data [e.g., ecological momentary assessment (EMA)] to examine associations between cannabis modalities and momentary subjective drug effects.
resultsA sample of 215 young adults who recreationally used cannabis (56.7% female, Mean age = 21 years) reported on cannabis use including patterns (e.g., modalities) and subjective drug effects across 21 days of EMA. Bong use was associated with greater momentary 'good effects', 'liking', and 'willingness to take cannabis again' compared to moments when a bowl was used. Vaporizer use was associated with lower subjective intoxication. When edibles were used, 'willingness to take cannabis again' was lower.
conclusionsFindings suggest that specific modalities (e.g., bong, vaporizer, edible) are associated with distinct subjective drug effects (e.g., intoxication, 'good effects', 'liking', 'willingness to take cannabis again'), which have previously been identified as key factors related to sustained and hazardous cannabis use. This highlights the importance of considering cannabis modalities in relation to their impact on misuse-related effects as well as to inform harm reduction approaches and early intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.