ArticleBehaviour research and therapy2026
Emotion regulation variability and chronic pain: An ecological momentary assessment study.
Article in Behaviour research and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is a significant public health problem associated with increased healthcare utilization and decreased quality of life. Mechanistic research focused on identifying vulnerabilities for the experience and impact of chronic pain is of critical importance to understanding and managing this public health burden. Emotion regulation, a cognitive-affective process involving attempts to influence the type, timing, and intensity of emotions has been linked to pain experience across multiple studies. Yet, conceptualizations have often focused on "adaptive" vs. "maladaptive" regulatory strategies. Variability in the type, number, and frequency of emotion regulation strategies across situations and over time has been associated with positive adjustment, is a critical component of emotion regulation flexibility, and may more comprehensively capture the way emotion regulation operates in the context of chronic pain. Therefore, the current study of 48 (77.1% female; Mage = 29.92 years, SD = 5.20 years) college students with self-reported chronic pain examined the impact of pain intensity, interference, and negative affect on emotion regulation variability. Participants completed 5 surveys a day for 7 days. Mixed-effects location scale models found that higher average levels of pain intensity, interference, and negative affect were associated with a greater number of strategies used to regulate pain experience, but in an invariable manner over time. Similarly, momentary increases in pain were associated with decreased intraindividual variation in emotion regulation strategy use. Overall, the results provide empirical evidence for the importance of emotion regulation variability in understanding both the variability and underlying mechanisms of evidence-based behavioral treatments for pain, informing broader models of flexibility in pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.