Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698195›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Fracture of robust fusion mass after sequential long-construct instrumentation removal: illustrative case.

Cale J Hendricks, Lane Geisness, David W Polly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cale J HendricksDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lane GeisnessDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David W PollyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult idiopathic scoliosis presenting after the age of 18 years affects 2%-4% of the adult population younger than 45 years. In the cases of multilevel spinal fusion, downstream complications, particularly pain and prominence, may warrant instrumentation removal. Even with proper fusion, deformity recurrence and loss of sagittal correction are common concerns. However, the literature on fusion mass fractures is minimal. OBSERVATIONS: A 52-year-old woman with a history of adult spinal deformity and posterior spinal fusion presented with discernable prominence at the proximal end of her instrumentation. Imaging confirmed a solid fusion mass, and sequential partial removal of her instrumentation was performed. Nine years after index removal, she returned with immediate pain following a low-energy injury. A subsequent CT scan showed a linear fracture line in her L3-4 fusion mass. Posterior fusion was performed with pedicle screw fixation of two levels above and below. LESSONS: Removal of thoracolumbar instrumentation poses potential risks, including fusion mass fracture, and requires careful risk-benefit analyses. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25582.

Indexed as

deformityfusion massidiopathic scoliosislumbar fusionpedicle screw fixationspinal fracture

Identifiers

PMID41698195
PMCPMC12908248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.