SynthesisWork (Reading, Mass.)2026
Return to work for health professionals with breast cancer as health recipients: A systematized review.
Synthesis in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundHealth professionals are at increased breast cancer(BC) risk. Occupational factors are likely contributory, especially nightwork. Return to work for women with BC has received much attention. However, systematic review of return-to-work among health professionals with BC is lacking.ObjectiveTo perform systematized review of the return-to-work literature on health professionals with BC.MethodsPRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines were followed, searching PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web-of-Science.ResultsFrom 2242 publications, 33 primarily qualitative studies addressed return-to-work among health professionals with BC. Fourteen return-to-work studies included some health professionals with BC. Ten studies addressed return-to-work among health professionals with cancer; 264 of whom had BC. Of nine case-studies/self-reports of health professionals with BC, seven worked within oncology. Occasionally-mentioned baseline working conditions included long workhours, nightshifts and busy schedules/multi-tasking. Particular concerns regarding chemotherapy for health professionals were infection risk, fatigue, cognitive function and appearance, the latter often impacting BC disclosure to patients. Emotional burdens when confronting patients' health problems while afflicted with BC were highlighted. Occasionally-implemented modifications with return-to-work were shortened workhours, nightwork elimination, modified duties or job change. Salutogenic developments with return-to-work included emotional rewards: feeling needed and enhanced sensitivity/empathy for patients with cancer. Issues surrounding the initial BC diagnosis were very delicate for health professionals. Three oncology nurses with BC were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.ConclusionsMuch more attention should be directed to the occupational needs as well as potential contributions of health professionals with BC. Participatory action research should guide intervention studies aimed at identifying the healthiest RTW options for this special cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.