Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697766›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Preoperative Ternary Classification of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules (AIS/MIA/IAC): ResNet-10 Outperforms Radiomics and Clinicoradiographic Models in Multicenter Study.

Dan Long, Zhichao Zuo, Huchuan Zhou, Wanyin Qi, Sanhong Zhang, Jinqiu Deng, Ziqiang Yang

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dan LongThe First Affiliated Hospital of Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Zhichao ZuoDepartment of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China.ORCID 0009-0004-4824-6138
Huchuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China.
Wanyin QiDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Sanhong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Liuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Jinqiu DengSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China.
Ziqiang YangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionPreoperative differentiation among adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) is crucial for guiding ground-glass nodule (GGN) management. This multicenter study evaluated the comparative utility of deep learning (DL), radiomics, and conventional machine learning (cML)-based clinicoradiographic models for this ternary classification.MethodsWe developed four DL models (DenseNet-121, ResNet-10, ResNet-18, and VGG-13) for the ternary classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC using multicenter CT datasets. For comparative analysis, we constructed two additional classification models: (1) a radiomics model employing feature engineering through analysis of variance, recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and (2) the cML-based clinicoradiographic model utilizing 12 different classifiers. The performance of all models was evaluated using the macro area under the curve (Macro-AUC) metric.Results847 GGNs postoperatively confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma were included in this multicenter study, which were randomly split into a training set (70%, n=592) and a validation set (30%, n=255). The DL model ResNet-10 demonstrated superior performance, achieving a Macro-AUC of 0.8055 (95% CI: 0.7723-0.8387), an accuracy of 0.6300 (95% CI: 0.5541-0.6764), and an F1-score of 0.4206 (95% CI: 0.3821-0.4598). This performance surpassed that of the radiomics model, which had a Macro-AUC of 0.7801 (95% CI: 0.7432-0.8170), an accuracy of 0.6100 (95% CI: 0.5276-0.6204), and an F1-score of 0.5505 (95% CI: 0.4983-0.6017), and the cML-based clinicoradiographic model, which achieved a Macro-AUC of 0.7770 (95% CI: 0.708-0.846), an accuracy of 0.6000 (95% CI: 0.5376-0.6604), and an F1-score of 0.4438 (95% CI: 0.3925-0.4961).ConclusionThe ResNet-10 network established a novel ternary classification model for predicting the invasiveness of GGNs. This approach provides clinically actionable insights that support surgical planning and facilitate risk-adapted management.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningRadiomicsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray Computedclinicoradiographic modeldeep learninginvasivenesspulmonary ground-Glass nodulesradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41697766
PMCPMC12909756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.