Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697697›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Enhanced Prenatal Care Models and Postpartum Depression: The EMBRACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jennifer N Felder, Daisy León-Martínez, Deborah Karasek, Venise Curry, Kristin Carraway, Patience A Afulani, Bridgette Blebu, Brittany Chambers-Butcher, Kimberly Coleman-Phox, Bethany J Simard and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04154423 (Comparing Approaches to Enhanced Prenatal Care to Improve Maternal and Child Health in Central CA), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04154423 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Approaches to Enhanced Prenatal Care to Improve Maternal and Child Health in Central CA

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2019 to 2024Enrolled678ConditionsPremature Birth, Pregnancy Preterm, Prenatal Stress, Depression, AnxietyArmsGlow! Group Prenatal Care, Individual Prenatal Care with CPSP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jennifer N FelderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Daisy León-MartínezDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Deborah KarasekSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Venise CurryCentral Valley Health Policy Institute, California State University, Fresno.
Kristin CarrawayCentral Valley Health Policy Institute, California State University, Fresno.
Patience A AfulaniDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Bridgette BlebuThe Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
Brittany Chambers-ButcherDepartment of Human Ecology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis.
Kimberly Coleman-PhoxDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Bethany J SimardDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Cinthia BlatDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Mary A GarzaCentral Valley Health Policy Institute, California State University, Fresno.
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Miriam KuppermannDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Racial, ethnic, and income disparities in perinatal depression prevalence and treatment are partially driven by social determinants of health. Effective treatments addressing these determinants are needed. Objective: To determine whether enhanced group prenatal care (eGPC) outperforms enhanced individual prenatal care (eIPC) for reducing perinatal depressive symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conduced in 10 Medicaid-serving clinics in California's San Joaquin Valley, enrolling English- or Spanish-speaking Medicaid-eligible pregnant individuals at less than 25 weeks' gestation, from November 2019 to January 2024, with 2 follow-up surveys through 12 weeks postpartum. Analyses were conducted as intention-to-treat. Data were analyzed from December 2024 to December 2025. Interventions: Participants were randomized to eIPC or eGPC. eIPC enhancements included assessments tailored to individual psychosocial, clinical, oral health, and substance use needs. eGPC enhancements included childcare, perinatal mental health screening and referral, transportation stipends, free groceries, and information on community resources. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was depression, operationalized as change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores from baseline to 3 months postpartum. Outcomes were assessed by masked assessors. Results: Of 1663 individuals assessed, 678 were enrolled and randomized; 4 withdrew consent, yielding an analyzed sample of 674 participants (mean [SD] age, 27.0 [5.8] years), including 50 African American or Black participants (7.4%); 37 biracial, multiracial, or multiethnic participants (5.5%); 485 Latine participants (72.0%); 77 White participants (11.4%); and 24 participants who identified as another race or ethnicity (3.6%). After randomization, there were 294 participants in the eGPC group and 380 participants in the eIPC group. No difference in reductions in depressive symptom severity from baseline to 3 months postpartum by randomization group was observed (Cohen d for between-group change, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.3; P = .45), adjusting for baseline depressive symptom severity, self-reported history of a mental health condition, language, and calendar time at enrollment. Instead, participants in both groups experienced small to moderate reductions in depression symptoms from baseline to 3 months postpartum (eGPC: mean [SD] difference, -2.2 [5.3]; Cohen d = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.3; P < .001; eIPC: mean [SD] difference, -1.6 [4.5]; Cohen d = -0.5; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.4; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of pregnant, low-income, primarily Latine individuals, statistically significant improvements were observed in depressive symptom severity from baseline to postpartum, regardless of prenatal care type. There was no evidence of a difference between enhanced prenatal care types for improving depressive symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04154423.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumPrenatal CareAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansMedicaidPregnancyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41697697
PMCPMC12910397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.