GuidelineEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Day-case percutaneous coronary procedures. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP) of the ESC.
Guideline in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary procedures performed in a day-case setting are intended to facilitate an optimised resource allocation and increase patient satisfaction without compromising procedural and long-term safety or efficacy. While an increasing number of centres have implemented a day-case approach, patient pathways and procedural aspects still lack standardisation, potentially leading to a large heterogeneity in practices. However, several centres and healthcare systems are still reluctant to adopt day-case diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures because of safety concerns, penalising reimbursement policies, or simple inertia. This clinical consensus statement summarises experience-based know-how and research-derived data on day-case coronary procedures with the objective of providing standardised practical guidance on patient selection, procedural considerations, and postprocedural management to facilitate wide-scale adoption of a day-case coronary programme. The document also provides clear advice on when such procedures must be converted into regular admissions to maximise patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.