Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697656›Full record

GuidelineEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Day-case percutaneous coronary procedures. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP) of the ESC.

Gabor G Toth, Nicolas Amabile, Emanuele Barbato, Britt Borregaard, Piotr Buszman, Thomas Cuisset, Martine Gilard, Stefan James, Rasha Al-Lamee, Kambis Mashayekhi and 5 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gabor G TothUniversity Heart Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicolas AmabileInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France.
Emanuele BarbatoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Britt BorregaardDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Piotr BuszmanCardiology Department, Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Kraków University, Krakow, Poland.
Thomas CuissetDépartement de Cardiologie, CHU Timone and Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Martine GilardDepartment of Cardiology, Brest University, Brest, France.
Stefan JamesDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rasha Al-LameeImperial College London, London, United Kingdom and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kambis MashayekhiDivision of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Lahr, Lahr, Germany.
Damiano RegazzoliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy.
Giovanna SarnoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jolanta M Siller-MatulaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Salvatore BrugalettaHospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Giulio StefaniniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary procedures performed in a day-case setting are intended to facilitate an optimised resource allocation and increase patient satisfaction without compromising procedural and long-term safety or efficacy. While an increasing number of centres have implemented a day-case approach, patient pathways and procedural aspects still lack standardisation, potentially leading to a large heterogeneity in practices. However, several centres and healthcare systems are still reluctant to adopt day-case diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures because of safety concerns, penalising reimbursement policies, or simple inertia. This clinical consensus statement summarises experience-based know-how and research-derived data on day-case coronary procedures with the objective of providing standardised practical guidance on patient selection, procedural considerations, and postprocedural management to facilitate wide-scale adoption of a day-case coronary programme. The document also provides clear advice on when such procedures must be converted into regular admissions to maximise patient safety.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresCardiologyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionConsensusEuropeHumansPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID41697656
PMCPMC12885074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.