Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697592›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

The quiet rest of the warrior: a story of life, death, taphonomy and bone diagenesis.

Edda E Guareschi, Paola A Magni, Brendan Chapman, Davide Persico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edda E GuareschiSouth Tyrol Museum of Archaeology, 39100, Bolzano - Bozen, Italy. Edda.Guareschi@murdoch.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-9872
Paola A MagniMedical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Brendan ChapmanMedical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Davide PersicoDipartimento Di Scienze Chimiche Della Vita E Della Sostenibilità Ambientale (SCVSA), Università Degli Studi Di Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abundance of human skeletal remains housed in museum collections can promote multidisciplinary expert collaborations and training following forensic protocols and methodologies. These can assist in the reconstruction of part of the history of the ecofacts, add to the cultural heritage and highlight the scientific and social value of museum collections. This study aims to present a typical example. A human skull recovered in the late 1960s / early 1970s in the Po River alluvial plain, in northern Italy, has since been housed in a local ethnographic museum, the Fondazione Museo Ettore Guatelli ( https://www.museoguatelli.it/en/ ). Recently rediscovered, the skull shows several morpho-anatomical alterations suggestive of congenital disease and perimortem trauma, along with peculiar bone staining of taphonomic and diagenetic origin. Despite remarkable limitations, including the skull fragility, an international multidisciplinary research team was able to apply modern protocols of forensic investigations to determine the biological profile, as well as a pathological condition, the cause of death (non-natural), the postmortem interval (PMI) (late Middle Ages) and the postmortem taphonomic history, reincluding the individual into the cultural narrative of the local community.

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesSkullForensic AnthropologyHumansItalyMuseumsFluvial taphonomyForensicsMuseum collectionsPostmortem historyPostmortem interval (PMI)

Identifiers

PMID41697592
PMCPMC13331942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.