ArticleSports medicine - open2026
Head Acceleration Events Measured by Instrumented Mouthguards in Elite Australian Football.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe consequences of exposure to head acceleration events (HAEs) in collision sports, including Australian Rules football, are a growing concern. Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) now enable accurate quantification of HAEs in sport; however, little is known about HAE incidence and mechanisms in Australian Rules football. We aimed to measure HAEs in elite Australian Rules football players, and evaluate the influence of playing position and match event on the incidence and magnitude of HAEs in men and women. iMG data were collected from Australian Football League (AFL) and AFL Women's (AFLW) players in 2023 utilising the HIT-IQ Nexus Gen III iMG, targeting 500 player-matches per sex. Match footage was synchronised with iMG data for video verification and match play coding.
resultsThree hundred and eleven players contributed iMG data in the analyses, including 126 men (median matches per player: 3 (interquartile range [IQR: 2-6]) and 185 women (median: 3 [IQR: 1-4]). Men had a higher mean incidence of HAEs ≥ 8 g per match than women (5.7 [95% confidence interval CI: 5.0-6.4] vs. 3.0 [95% CI: 2.8-3.3]), however the incidence was comparable when adjusted for time (3.6/hour [95% CI: 3.2-4.1] vs. 3.1/hour [95% CI: 2.9-3.4]). Men recorded higher maximum single-impact peak linear acceleration (PLA; median 31 g vs. women: median 22 g; p < 0.001) and peak rotational acceleration (PRA; median 3.0 krad/s² vs. women: 2.4 krad/s²; p < 0.001) per match. Conversely, women experienced greater PRA per impact (median 1.4 krad/s² vs. men: 1.2 krad/s²; p < 0.001), while PLA was similar (men: median 14 g, women: median 13 g; p = 0.330). The leading match events resulting in HAEs were marking contests (1.0/hour) in men and contested ball situations (0.8/hour) in women. HAE incidence and magnitude were generally comparable across playing positions, except for men's rucks, who experienced significantly higher incidence of HAEs (6.5/hour) than forwards (3.6/hour), midfielders (3.2/hour), and defenders (2.7/hour).
conclusionsThis study highlights differences in HAE incidence, magnitude, and mechanisms by sex, playing position, and match events in elite-level Australian Rules football. These findings provide insight into impact exposure patterns and may inform targeted skill development and policy adjustments to enhance player safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.