ArticleInflammopharmacology2026
Re-evaluating the antibacterial properties of DMARD and pro-drug sulphasalazine against autoimmune bacterial triggers after eighty years.
Article in Inflammopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathogens in rheumatoid arthritis: epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical insights.Biomarker research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulphasalazine (SSZ) has been used to treat a range of inflammatory conditions since the 1940s. It functions as a pro-drug that, upon azoreduction by selected gastrointestinal bacteria (including the bacterial triggers of some inflammatory diseases), releases an antioxidant protective molecule, 5-aminosalicylate (5-AS), and the antibacterial molecule sulfapyridine (SP). SSZ, 5-AS and SP were evaluated for growth inhibitory activity against some bacterial triggers of rheumatoid arthritis (Proteus spp.), ankylosing spondylitis (Klebsiella pnumoniae), multiple sclerosis (Acinetobacter baylyi and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and rheumatic fever (Streptococcus pyogenes). These bacteria have previously been reported to have azoreductase activity and therefore they may locally convert the SSZ pro-drug into 5-AS and SP. The potency of all compounds, as well as a combination of 5-AS and SP, were evaluated under aerobic conditions by MIC, ƩFIC and isobologram analysis. Noteworthy antibacterial activity was calculated for SSZ, with MIC values as low as 625 µg/mL against P. mirabilis and K. pneumoniae. The azoreduction product SP had substantially more potent antibacterial activity (MICs 78-625 µg/mL). It was particularly potent against the Proteus spp. triggers of rheumatoid arthritis. Whilst 5-AS also inhibited bacterial growth, it was substantially less potent than SP. However, 5-AS potentiated the activity of SP when tested in combination. Indeed, synergy was noted for the combination against P. vulgaris, whilst additive effects were recorded against P. mirabilis and K. pneumoniae. Taken together, these results highlight the pro-drug properties of SZ against the bacterial triggers of selected inflammatory diseases. Future studies into the pharmacological properties of SSZ, as well as the 5-AS and SP combination are warranted. In particular, these compounds should be evaluated against additional strains of these bacteria (including antibiotic-resistant strains), as well as against bacterial triggers of further inflammatory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.