Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697518›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

The journey from congress to journal: publication patterns of ECR 2019 oral presentations.

Ali Salbas, Raşit Eren Büyüktoka, Murat Yogurtcu, Münevver İlke Kaya, Binnur Emre, Ali Murat Koc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali SalbasDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. dralisalbas@gmail.com.
Raşit Eren BüyüktokaDepartment of Radiology, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Murat YogurtcuDepartment of Radiology, Tire State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Münevver İlke KayaDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Binnur EmreDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Ali Murat KocDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-6367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the publication outcomes of oral presentations delivered at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2019 and examine factors influencing conversion to full-text articles; findings were also compared with ECR 2010. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1817 oral presentations from ECR 2019 were analyzed. Publication status was determined by searching PubMed/MEDLINE up to December 2023. For each matched article, Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and Google Scholar citations/year were recorded. Additional variables included country of origin, collaboration type, imaging modality, and study design. Statistical analyses used chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

resultsOf 1817 oral presentations, 844 (46.5%) were published, with no significant difference from ECR 2010 (43%, p = 0.091). Abstracts originated from 71 countries, with Italy (16.5%) and China (15.5%) contributing the most. Publications appeared in 254 journals. Publication rates varied significantly by country (p < 0.001), with Switzerland (74.4%) and the Netherlands (68.8%) achieving the highest rates. When analyzed by continent, abstracts from Asia showed a significantly higher publication rate than those from Europe (52.3% vs. 43.6%, p = 0.001). Publication outcomes also varied significantly by imaging modality (p = 0.002) and subspecialty (p < 0.001). Breast imaging achieved the highest median JIF (4.9), whereas Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) demonstrated the highest median annual citation count (10.5).

conclusionsNearly half of the ECR 2019 oral presentations achieved peer-reviewed publication, maintaining rates from 2010. The congress's contributor landscape has become more global, with greater participation from Asia. While traditional radiological fields remain prevalent, AI/ML abstracts demonstrated high citation rates. These findings reflect contemporary trends in radiological research. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: By analyzing the publication outcomes of ECR 2019, with comparisons to 2010 data, this study examines evolving global patterns in publication outcomes, offering insights to enhance the dissemination of radiological research. KEY POINTS: Converting oral presentations to publications remains challenging in radiological research. Nearly half of the ECR 2019 oral presentations were published, showing a modest, non-significant increase from ECR 2010. The congress has become increasingly global, with notable growth in participation from Asia. This study reveals radiology's evolving scientific landscape and current research priorities.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCongresses as topicJournal impact factorPublishingRadiology

Identifiers

PMID41697518
PMCPMC12909687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.