ReviewEndocrine2026
De-escalation strategies in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer.
Review in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) have led to a dramatic toward treatment de-escalation. This comprehensive narrative review synthesizes evidence from major trials, cohort studies, and guidelines to outline evidence-based approaches that preserve oncologic safety while minimizing morbidity and healthcare costs. Active surveillance (AS) for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) achieves a 10-year disease-specific survival of 100%, with less than 4% progression to nodal metastasis. For surgically managed low-risk DTC, lobectomy provides equivalent survival to total thyroidectomy but markedly lowers rates of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury (0.5% vs. 3.5%). Adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) can be safely omitted in low-risk cases, while moderate thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression (0.5-2.0 mU/L) minimizes cardiovascular and skeletal risks. Economic analyses further validate the cost-effectiveness of AS and lobectomy, reducing both upfront and lifetime healthcare burdens. Emerging minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency and laser ablation show promise as future alternatives. De-escalation guided by clinicopathologic risk and patient preference ensures optimal quality of life without compromising survival, representing a modern, precision-based approach to thyroid cancer management. Continued research and global adoption of these strategies are vital to refine safe, cost-effective, and patient-centered care. De-escalation tailored to clinicopathologic risk and patient preference is safe, effective, and economically favorable for low-risk DTC. Future efforts should focus on expanding the adoption of active surveillance, validating minimally invasive therapies, and refining molecular biomarkers to better distinguish indolent from aggressive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41697514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.