ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Reliability and validity of Arabic version of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 questionnaire (LURN SI-10).
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological issues on the Arabic adaptation of the LURN SI-10 questionnaire.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 (LURN SI-10) questionnaire for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTs) in Arabic-speaking patients.
methodsThe LURN SI-10 was translated into Arabic following the Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium guidelines, with back-translation and a pilot study among 15 patients for clarity. The Arabic version of LURN-SI 10, and the validated Arabic versions of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) questionnaires were administered for patients with LUTs. Reliability, internal consistency and concurrent validity of LURN-SI 10 were established.
resultsFrom October 2024 to February 2025, 186 patients with LUTS were enrolled. The Arabic LURN SI-10 demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.8; all subdomains > 0.7). Significant positive correlations were found between LURN SI-10 with IPSS (r = 0.780, 0.833, 0.683, p < 0.001) and ICIQ-OAB (r = 0.730, 0.768, 0.674 p < 0.001) for all patients, males and females respectively. Frequency, urgency, nocturia, and weak stream domains of LURN SI-10 correlated significantly with their IPSS counterparts. Frequency, nocturia, urgency, and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) correlated with ICIQ-OAB domains. Significant positive correlations were noted between pain, urgency, and other domains, including post-void dribbling (PVD), bladder pain, and bother.
conclusionThe Arabic LURN SI-10 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing LUTs, showing strong correlations with IPSS and ICIQ-OAB. The comprehensive assessment of PVD, UUI, stress urinary incontinence, and bladder pain enhances its utility over IPSS for both male and female patients with LUTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.