ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Luteal-phase deficiency and diminished ovarian reserve: a narrative review of interactions and clinical implications.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and luteal phase defect (LPD) are common endocrine disorders affecting the fertility of women of reproductive age. Traditionally, these conditions have been considered and treated independently. However, clinical observations frequently reveal that patients with DOR also exhibit features of LPD, suggesting a potential pathophysiological link between them. This review aims to explore the interplay between DOR and LPD from a novel perspective by integrating epidemiological data, current diagnostic and therapeutic practices, and recent insights into molecular mechanisms. Special emphasis is placed on the role of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis dysfunction, oxidative stress-inflammatory microenvironment imbalance, and key signaling pathways, such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, in mediating their interaction. We propose a central hypothesis: LPD may not merely be a complication of DOR; rather, intrinsic features of LPD-such as insufficient or prematurely withdrawn progesterone secretion-may exert negative feedback on the HPG axis and exacerbate oxidative damage within the ovarian microenvironment, thereby actively contributing to the onset or progression of DOR. Based on this hypothesis, we further suggest that treating LPD-particularly through luteal phase support therapy-may have benefits beyond improving endometrial receptivity. Such interventions could potentially modulate the endocrine milieu at both the systemic and local ovarian levels, thereby playing a role in managing DOR and possibly improving antral follicle count (AFC). These insights open up new directions for future therapeutic strategies targeting DOR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.