ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
The prevalence of unclosed transverse foramina in the cervical spine of a South African population sample.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUnclosed transverse foramina (UTF) represent anatomical variations of the cervical vertebrae that may influence vertebral artery, vein or sympathetic nerves, particularly at the level of the atlas (C1). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and distribution of UTF in a South African skeletal population and to evaluate associations with age, biological sex, and population affinity.
methodsA macroscopic osteological assessment of cervical vertebrae from 800 individuals was performed using a South African skeletal repository. UTF were identified based on incomplete osseous closure of the transverse foramen. Prevalence was assessed at individual and vertebral levels, and demographic associations were analyzed statistically.
resultsUTF were identified in 17.4% of individuals and 2.9% of total vertebrae. The highest prevalence occurred at C1, followed by C3 and C6. Unilateral UTF were more common than bilateral, with a right-sided predominance. UTF were observed more frequently in males, individuals younger than 50 years, and those of Black African population affinity, with the highest prevalence in the Sotho subgroup. A weak but significant association with younger age was noted at the C2 and C7 levels (p < 0.05).
conclusionUTF are common anatomical variants in this South African population, with prevalence influenced by vertebral level and demographic factors. Recognition of UTF is important for accurate radiological interpretation and for surgical and manual procedures involving the cervical spine, where altered neurovascular anatomy may affect procedural planning and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.