ArticlePsychological research2026
Happy and threatening faces differentially influence facilitation and interference over time.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The influence of emotion on attention remains debated across competing theoretical models. Using a modified flanker task, this study examined how happy and threatening facial expressions modulate focused attention across early and late stages of task performance. In the neutral baseline, participants displayed classic flanker patterns—both facilitation and interference—in the early stage. While interference persisted into the late stage, facilitation dissipated, indicating a transient attentional benefit. Emotion conditions revealed distinct early-stage modulations. Happy faces selectively enhanced early-stage facilitation and reduced interference, whereas threat faces amplified early-stage interference and eliminated facilitation. In the late stage, facilitation disappeared across all conditions, while interference persisted. Comparatively, happy expressions enhanced early facilitation but showed no late-stage facilitation effects, while producing increased interference in the late stage; threat expressions consistently abolished facilitation across both stages and produced stronger early- than late-stage interference. Distributional analyses revealed that these temporal shifts were not simply mean-level changes but reflected stage-specific dynamics in selective attention and processing efficiency. Together, these findings challenge models predicting sustained emotional modulation and instead support transient attentional recalibration shaped by adaptation and habituation. This study underscores the value of integrating temporal and distributional approaches to capture how brief emotional signals reshape attention over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41697379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.