Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2026
Efficacy of tracheal and gastric tube consecutive insertion under videolaryngoscopy in reducing complications associated with gastric tube insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of tracheal and gastric tube consecutive insertion under videolaryngoscopy: a reply.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comments on "Efficacy of tracheal and gastric tube consecutive insertion under videolaryngoscopy in reducing complications associated with gastric tube insertion: a randomized controlled trial" by Yamaguchi et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insertion of a gastric tube in anesthetized patients is frequently difficult. The "consecutive insertion method", in which a videolaryngoscope is inserted, a tube is inserted to the trachea and a gastric tube insertion guide (with a gastric tube in it) to the esophagus before removing the videolaryngoscope, may reduce complications associated with insertion of a gastric tube. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to the consecutive insertion method (in group C) and blind method (in group B), to compare the incidence of complications, the success rate, and insertion time. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in group C than in group B (2 vs. 12 patients) (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the success rate of insertion of a gastric tube between groups B and C (25 vs. 30 patients) (P = 0.052). The median apnea time was significantly longer in group C (46 vs. 35 s) (P = 0.00052), whereas the median total insertion time was significantly shorter in group C (117 vs. 138 s) (P = 0.015). Compared with blind insertion of a gastric tube, consecutive insertion of a tracheal tube and a gastric tube (through an insertion guide) would reduce the incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.