GuidelineEuropean radiology2026
ESR Essentials: imaging in nasal obstruction and epistaxis-practice recommendations by the European Society of Head and Neck Radiology.
Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The olfactory-glymphatic syndrome: linking smell dysfunction, cognitive impairment and sleep disturbances in neuropathological disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasal obstruction and epistaxis are common otorhinolaryngologic complaints with multiple etiologies ranging from benign anatomical variations and mucosal inflammation to severe neoplastic and vascular disorders. Clinical evaluation and nasal endoscopy are first-line diagnostic tools, with imaging reserved for selected indications. Imaging differentiates uncomplicated from complicated presentations, guiding management and surgical planning. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary modality for assessing sinonasal anatomical variants, bony pathology, and inflammatory or neoplastic disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complements CT when soft tissue or intracranial extension is suspected. Imaging in epistaxis is not routinely indicated but is recommended in recurrent, severe, or posterior bleeding to detect underlying vascular lesions or tumors. CT angiography is preferred for vascular assessment and interventional planning. Implementing these recommendations can improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline patient management, and enhance surgical outcomes in patients presenting with nasal obstruction and epistaxis. KEY POINTS: Clinical history and nasal endoscopy should be the primary tools for initial assessment, with imaging reserved for inconclusive or persistent cases. CT is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating structural causes of nasal obstruction, especially prior to surgical intervention. Imaging in epistaxis is indicated mainly in severe, recurrent, or posterior bleeding to localize the source and guide treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.