ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2026
Effect of foot fixation on muscle activation and power output during the Wingate test in cyclists.
Article in European journal of translational myology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effect of simulated foot fixation on neuromuscular activation and power output during a 30-second isokinetic Wingate-type test in trained cyclists. Sixteen well-trained male cyclists and triathletes completed two randomized crossover trials under distinct pedal-foot interface conditions: fixed-foot, using standard athletic shoes secured to flat pedals with elastic bandage to restrict vertical movement, and free-foot, using standard shoes without fixation. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) was recorded from the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and tibialis anterior to quantify muscle activation, while an isokinetic ergometer continuously measured mechanical power. Compared with the free-foot condition, simulated fixation produced significantly higher peak power (1365.3±153.5 W vs. 1299.0±150.7 W, p=0.016, d=0.68) and mean power (900.6±88.4 W vs. 838.3±98.3 W, p <0.001, d=1.35), but also a greater fatigue index (47.8±8.0% vs. 37.2±8.5%, p <0.001, d=1.25). Integrated EMG (iEMG) values increased across all monitored muscles, particularly in the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and tibialis anterior, indicating altered neuromuscular coordination and enhanced activation of biarticular and stabilizing muscles. These findings suggest that mechanical stabilization of the foot-pedal interface enhances torque transmission and short-term power generation but concurrently accelerates fatigue development due to elevated neuromuscular and metabolic demands. The results emphasize a trade-off between instantaneous performance gains and fatigue progression, relevant for interpreting Wingate-type tests and optimizing sprint-specific cycling training and equipment configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.