ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2026
Persistent and Emerging High-Risk Clusters of Leprosy Detection in Brazil: A Nationwide Spatiotemporal Analysis, 2001-2023.
Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrazil accounts for a substantial share of the global leprosy burden, with persistent high-risk areas and marked spatial inequalities in case detection. Identifying spatiotemporal clusters of transmission is crucial for targeting surveillance and control efforts.
objectiveTo identify the spatial and temporal variation of high-risk clusters for leprosy detection in Brazil (2001-2023) and priority areas for intervention.
methodsThis was a nationwide, population-based ecological study using Brazilian municipalities (n = 5570) as units of analysis. Frequencies, crude detection rates and age- and sex-adjusted detection rates of newly recorded leprosy cases were calculated, based on the national Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN). Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic (Poisson model) was applied to overlapping three-year periods to identify statistically significant high-risk clusters. Neighbouring categories and changes between consecutive triennia were compared to classify municipalities into clusters based on persistence, entry, or exit.
resultsOver the study period, a total of 795,802 cases were reported (age- and sex-adjusted detection rate: 17.58/100,000 population; 95% CI: 17.54-17.62), with higher occurrence among males and residents of the Northeast region. Significantly high-risk clusters were concentrated in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions; approximately 23% of municipalities were part of significant clusters in each triennium. The proportion of municipalities newly entering clusters increased from 10.7% (2003-2005 vs. 2001-2003) to 36.0% (2021-2023 vs. 2019-2021). In the most recent triennium (2021-2023), 16.9% of municipalities remained within significant clusters.
conclusionThe persistence and (re)emergence of high-risk leprosy clusters in historically hyperendemic and socially vulnerable territories indicate sustained operational failures and demand programmatic prioritisation, with intensified surveillance, timely diagnosis and adequate treatment, particularly in the North, Northeast and Central-West regions of Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.