Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696777›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy

YSQ-GeMS: Development of a Short Form of the Young Schema Questionnaire for Geriatric Mental Health Care Using Item Response Theory.

L Botter, P F M Krabbe, D L Gerritsen, S D M van Dijk, R C Oude Voshaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L BotterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
P F M KrabbeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
D L GerritsenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
S D M van DijkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-5235
R C Oude VoshaarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1501-4774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schema therapy is effective for older adults with personality disorders, but the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ) may be too lengthy for use in geriatric mental health care. This study evaluated the construct validity of the YSQ-L2 in adults aged 35-97 years receiving residential or outpatient geriatric, psychiatric or medical care and developed a shorter form for this population. Data from 214 participants from Dutch nursing homes and outpatient services were analysed using Item Response Theory across 16 YSQ-L2 subscales. Each subscale was reduced to five items based on discrimination, difficulty, Differential Item Functioning for cognitive status and face validity. Most items showed adequate discrimination and coverage, whereas the Enmeshment scale had limited sensitivity and the Social Undesirability scale was excluded. The resulting 75-item YSQ-GeMS showed strong concordance with the original, providing a psychometrically robust and efficient tool for schema assessment in geriatric mental health care.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedMental Health ServicesPsychometricsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNursing HomesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesitem response theorylong‐term carenursing home careolder adultsschema therapyyoung schema questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID41696777
PMCPMC12908208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.