ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery, European volume2026
Economic benefits of WALANT anaesthesia in metacarpal and phalangeal fracture surgery.
Article in The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe wide-awake-local-anaesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique is increasingly used in hand surgery, avoiding general or regional anaesthesia and upper arm tourniquets. Clinical and economic benefits have been shown especially for trigger finger and carpal tunnel release; however, its impact on fracture treatment warrants evaluation.
methodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of 921 metacarpal and phalangeal hand operations for fracture treatment, including both fixation and removal of metalwork. The operation time and cost of procedures performed under WALANT were compared with those using regional anaesthesia (RA) with brachial plexus block. Reimbursement for the procedures were compared with the cost.
resultsThe WALANT technique significantly reduced the operation time and treatment cost compared with RA. However, we found that the reimbursement structure did not fully cover the procedural expenses in either group. Despite this, WALANT reduced financial deficits, demonstrating superior cost-effectiveness.
conclusionIn addition to reducing operative time and overall procedural costs, WALANT decreased dependence on anaesthesia capacity, thereby improving the efficiency of surgical workflows. This approach also promotes a more sustainable model of healthcare delivery by minimizing resource consumption and simplifying logistics. Moreover, its cost-effectiveness may enhance the long-term economic feasibility of reimbursement and funding systems within modern healthcare structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.