ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026
Investigation of High Efficacy Groups for Hospital-Wide Standardized Hypnotic Bundles on Insomnia: A Subgroup Analysis of the COBATON Study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In a previous study, a reduction in hypnotic-related fall and injury incidence rates was revealed after the hospital-wide standardization of hypnotic bundles for insomnia. Subsequently, a subgroup analysis was conducted to identify high-efficacy groups for new hypnotic bundles. Methods: Total fall rates, hypnotic-related fall rates, and injury incidences before and after standardization of the new bundle were analyzed using seven subgroups: sex, age > 75 years, stroke, pneumonia, heart failure, fragility fractures, and dementia. Information on patients who fell, excluding pediatric patients, was collected from the Saitama Citizens Medical Center database. Results: No subgroups with reduced fall rates were identified after standardization. Hypnotic-related fall rates were reduced after the standardization in males (incidence risk ratio [IRR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.84) and those > 75 years old (IRR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.85). Conclusions: Hospital-wide efforts to standardize hypnotic bundles for insomnia may be more useful than efforts for a limited group. Even with interprofessional work, effective fall prevention practices can be challenging. Efforts to manage the risk of falls may shift to trauma prevention hospital-wide actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.