Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696726›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026

Practice-Based Research Network Activities and Future Nationwide Plans in Japan.

Hirotomo Yamanashi, Anna Dania, Makoto Kaneko, Takamasa Watanabe, Takahiro Mochizuki, Moe Kuroda, Mariko Ishisaka, Tadao Okada, Takuya Aoki, Yoshihiro Okura and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hirotomo YamanashiDepartment of General Medicine Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-4519
Anna DaniaDepartment of Family Medicine/General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands.
Makoto KanekoDepartment of Health Data Science Yokohama City University Kanagawa Japan.
Takamasa WatanabeCentre for Family Medicine Development Japanese Health and Welfare Co-Operative Federation Tokyo Japan.
Takahiro MochizukiJapan Association for Development of Community Medicine (JADECOM) Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-2097
Moe KurodaDepartment of General Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Mariko IshisakaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Miyazaki Miyazaki Japan.
Tadao OkadaTesshoukai Kameda Family Clinic Tateyama Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4002-3966
Takuya AokiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-2155
Yoshihiro OkuraTokushima Health Co-Operative Kensei-Ishii Clinic Tokushima Japan.
Hiroshi TakayanagiThe Community Medical Support Center Kumamoto University Hospital Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-2539
Jun HamanoInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-9881
Hideki MoriDepartment of General Internal Medicine NHO Nagasaki Medical Center Nagasaki Japan.
Koichiro KadotaJuko Memorial Nagasaki Hospital Nagasaki Japan.
Yuya MotoishiKoyagi Clinic Nagasaki Japan.
Jun MiyataDepartment of Island and Community Medicine Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-4930
Koichiro HamadaDepartment of General Medicine Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.
Shingo MasudaDepartment of General Medicine Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3902-4635
Takahiro MaedaDepartment of General Medicine Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) have historically been effective support mechanisms for primary care research. Although the number of PBRNs worldwide has increased, their numbers in Japan are relatively limited. This study aims to elucidate the current PBRN landscape in Japan and the process of establishing a new PBRN to encourage the formation of similar networks. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional descriptive study in which six PBRNs in Japan were identified using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PBRN Registry. Detailed information regarding their PBRN characteristics and activities was collected using a standardized Excel template. We further conducted an embedded illustrative case study of the experiences and lessons learned from initiating a PBRN, using data gathered from the steering committee members of the network and document review. Results: Six primary care-focused PBRNs were found in regions ranging from large cities to isolated islands. Their relationships with academic external stakeholders also vary. All networks were established within the past 15 years, with most encountering funding challenges. The illustrative case study highlighted several key lessons, including the significance of motivation, necessity for clear membership and defined roles of PBRN members, the governance structure of the PBRN organizational diagram, and the importance of sustainable activities and funding. Conclusions: PBRNs play a crucial role in building a sustainable foundation of evidence for primary care research. Support from the Japan Primary Care Association committees and the Global PBRN Initiative significantly aids in advancing PBRN activities, ultimately enhancing primary care research in Japan.

Indexed as

evidence‐based practicegeneral practiceJapan healthcare infrastructuremember engagement strategiesPractice‐based Research Network (PBRN)primary care research

Identifiers

PMID41696726
PMCPMC12897558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.