ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026
Practice-Based Research Network Activities and Future Nationwide Plans in Japan.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) have historically been effective support mechanisms for primary care research. Although the number of PBRNs worldwide has increased, their numbers in Japan are relatively limited. This study aims to elucidate the current PBRN landscape in Japan and the process of establishing a new PBRN to encourage the formation of similar networks. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional descriptive study in which six PBRNs in Japan were identified using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PBRN Registry. Detailed information regarding their PBRN characteristics and activities was collected using a standardized Excel template. We further conducted an embedded illustrative case study of the experiences and lessons learned from initiating a PBRN, using data gathered from the steering committee members of the network and document review. Results: Six primary care-focused PBRNs were found in regions ranging from large cities to isolated islands. Their relationships with academic external stakeholders also vary. All networks were established within the past 15 years, with most encountering funding challenges. The illustrative case study highlighted several key lessons, including the significance of motivation, necessity for clear membership and defined roles of PBRN members, the governance structure of the PBRN organizational diagram, and the importance of sustainable activities and funding. Conclusions: PBRNs play a crucial role in building a sustainable foundation of evidence for primary care research. Support from the Japan Primary Care Association committees and the Global PBRN Initiative significantly aids in advancing PBRN activities, ultimately enhancing primary care research in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.