Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696724›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026

Perspectives of Japanese Citizens on Advance Care Planning in Clinical Settings: Findings From a Focus Group Study.

Michiko Abe, Chikako Banjo, Machiko Inoue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michiko AbeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Chikako BanjoCommunity Nursing Consultation Room Live Hamamatsu Japan.
Machiko InoueDepartment of Family and Community Medicine Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-5894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although advance care planning (ACP) has been vigorously promoted by the Japanese government, it remains unfamiliar to the general public. This study explored citizens' perspectives on ACP conversations in clinical settings using a newly developed handbook to support such discussions. Methods: A qualitative study using four focus group interviews was conducted in March 2024 with 15 citizens aged 53-77, recruited through local networks. Participants included cancer survivors, family caregivers, and individuals with bereavement experiences and/or professional experience in healthcare. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) positive responses to ACP, (2) expectations for the broader promotion of ACP, (3) concerns regarding ACP and the use of the Handbook, and (4) real-life experiences related to ACP. Many participants expressed willingness to engage in ACP, and the Handbook was valued as a concrete tool for structuring conversations. Concerns were raised about whether healthcare professionals would have time and readiness to engage in ACP in busy hospital settings, suggesting a misalignment between citizens' openness to ACP and professionals' assumptions about patients' reluctance. Conclusions: This study highlights the perspectives of relatively healthy citizens, an area that remains understudied. A proactive segment of the public willing to engage in ACP was identified. To support this, practical tools such as the Handbook should be accompanied by institutional support and professional readiness. Encouraging dialogue among citizens themselves may further help foster broader social momentum for ACP in Japan.

Indexed as

advance care planningcitizensfocus group interviewshandbookqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41696724
PMCPMC12897550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.