ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Assessing the impact of waterfront trail aesthetics on psychological restoration in urban environments: a deep learning and random forest approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban waterfront trails can promote psychological restoration, yet how specific landscape attributes shape scenic beauty and multidimensional restorative perception across different revetment types remains unclear. This study quantified 15 landscape variables (F1-F15) across 30 urban waterfront trail sites and examined their associations with scenic beauty estimation (SBE) and four restorative dimensions (emotional, cognitive, physiological, and behavioral). Spearman correlation analysis, non-parametric group comparisons, and Random Forest modeling were applied to identify key predictors, with variable importance interpreted as predictive contributions rather than causal mechanisms. Partial-mediation structural equation models (SEM) were then constructed for the overall sample and for artificial, mixed, and natural revetment types. Results indicated that F4 was the most influential predictor of SBE, followed by F7, F13, F2, and F5. SEM analyses showed that SBE functioned as a central mediator linking landscape attributes to restorative outcomes: F4 was positively associated with SBE (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.