ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Local policy governance arrangements and COVID-19-related mortality in municipalities in Japan: a cross-sectional ecological study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electoral governance as a political determinant of health: state policy context, risk perception, and voter safety.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19-related mortality varied substantially within and across countries, which may not be fully explained by demographic and clinical differences. Some studies suggest that local governors' ideology has a substantial effect on mortality because of their political stances for and against the stringency of public health interventions. However, recent research indicates that stringency is not consistently related to lower mortality. This study investigated whether regional differences in COVID-19 mortality are attributable to differences in local governance arrangements for collaborative policy responses to pandemic situations in Japan, where local infection control was managed via a decentralized system. Methods: From December 2020 to November 2021, we conducted a city-level, cross-sectional, ecological study of 20 cities designated by the government ordinance of Japan. COVID-19-related mortality rates were obtained per 3-month period to account for viral variant change. The local deliberative decision to suspend the national health insurance policy that temporarily revokes the benefit eligibility of households because of unpaid premiums was considered an indicator of flexible and collaborative governance, as the decision required unanimous consensus from diverse stakeholders within and across local government institutes. Negative binomial regression was used adjusting for covariates, including population density and emergency care accessibility. Results: During the study, 5,383 COVID-19-related deaths were reported. Of the 20 cities, five had implemented the suspension decision before or during the pandemic. Cities with the suspension policy showed an adjusted mortality relative risk of 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.94) compared with cities that retained the temporary revocation policy. Conclusions: The results suggest that local governments with flexible collaborative policymaking were more successful in mitigating the COVID-19 mortality impact in Japan. The findings highlight the potentially important effect of governance arrangements on population health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.