ArticleJBMR plus2026
Novel image registration approach for combining 2D Osterix and collagen bundles images with 3D micro-CT.
Article in JBMR plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study bone healing, different imaging techniques are typically employed. Histological and immunohistological methods allow the visualization of Osterix (OSX) expression and collagen structures, whereas μCT imaging enables the assessment of mineralized tissue. However, a clear spatial alignment between the information obtained from these 2 modalities is still lacking. In this study, we present a technological approach for registering 2D histological sections of collagen bundles and OSX signals with 3D volumetric μCT data. We applied this method to datasets from animals with rigid and semi-rigid fracture fixation to resemble fast and effective healing and delayed healing. Using our 2D-3D registration workflow, we were able to identify corresponding 2D μCT and histological slices, and we showed that the algorithm performed consistently across both fixation conditions, resembling the healing consequences. Thus, we could illustrate how such image registration techniques could be used to study the co-localization of OSX, collagen, and hydroxyapatite (HA). This framework enables the visualization and direct comparison of OSX, collagen, and HA within a single, spatially matched image, providing a tool for future studies to quantitatively explore tissue co-localization and spatial relationships during bone healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.