Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696688›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Incorporating softmax in psychophysical detection models for normal and electric hearing.

Savine S M Martens, Jeroen J Briaire, Johan H M Frijns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Savine S M MartensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology of Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, , the Netherlands.
Jeroen J BriaireDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology of Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, , the Netherlands.
Johan H M FrijnsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology of Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, , the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling psychophysical auditory detection has proven to be difficult, as with existing neural models and detection models, we were unable to adjust the slope of the psychometric curve accurately. In machine learning, the softmax function is an excellent tool to assign probabilities to model outputs. Incorporating this function into psychophysical detection models can enhance the precision of the auditory detection model. This study extended Hamacher's detection model by integrating a softmax function, providing additional control over the slope of psychometric curves.•Using computational simulations of both normal and electric hearing, we applied this enhanced model to two psychophysical tasks: masker-probe detection and amplitude modulation detection.•The outcomes demonstrated that the normal hearing model aligned closely with expected performance, with predictable shifts in psychometric curves as the noise and slope parameters varied. In addition, with the electric hearing model, the new detection model could now reach lower asymptotes in the psychometric curve than with Hamacher's detection model.•These findings suggest that incorporating the softmax function provides a flexible tool for modeling auditory psychophysical data. This tool has potential applications for in silico evaluation of speech coding strategies for cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantsComputational auditory modelPsychometric curvePsychophysical testsSoftmax function

Identifiers

PMID41696688
PMCPMC12906149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.