ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Development of a Deep Learning Model to Automatically Identify Palatal Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Maxillary Dental Casts.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of automated algorithm-based versus manual dental landmark placement for model analysis and evaluation of orthodontic quality indices.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Development of a Deep Learning Model to Automatically Identify Palatal Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Maxillary Dental Casts.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a deep learning model to automatically identify palatal landmarks on three-dimensional (3D) digital maxillary dental casts, and to evaluate model performance. Materials and Methods: Twelve palatal landmarks were manually annotated on each 3D digital maxillary dental cast from 377 individuals in the permanent dentition stage. Manually annotated landmarks were used as ground truth to develop and to evaluate a deep learning model for automatic landmark detection. A two-stage PointNet++ architecture was employed, where coarse landmark predictions were first generated, followed by localized refinement for improved precision. The model accuracy was evaluated by measuring the linear discrepancy between the final predicted and the ground-truth landmark positions. Results: A PointNet++-based hierarchical deep learning model, designed to extract both local and global features from point clouds, was developed. The model demonstrated a mean landmark detection error of 0.55 mm (SD ± 0.49) between predicted and ground-truth positions across 12 landmarks. The model also exhibited high predictive performance, correctly predicting 90% of landmarks within 1 mm and 98% within 2 mm of the ground truth. Conclusions: A deep learning model was developed for automated identification of 12 palatal landmarks on 3D maxillary dental casts, which demonstrated high performance. Our model will enable more efficient morphological assessment of the palate by substantially reducing the time for manual annotation in clinical and research settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.