Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696614›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

A new modification of renal track creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a novel technique.

Mohamed Abdelrahman Alhefnawy, Mohamed Abdelzaher, Helmy Ahmed Eldib, Mohamed Kadry, Mahmoud Mobarak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed Abdelrahman AlhefnawyUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.
Mohamed AbdelzaherUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.
Helmy Ahmed EldibUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.
Mohamed KadryUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.
Mahmoud MobarakUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare our novel access creation technique and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in terms of perioperative outcomes. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with partial or complete stag horn stones that were larger than 4 cm were the subjects of the prospective randomized clinical trial. Randomly, the patients were divided into two equal groups; group 1 (the novel group) was administered the novel technique. Using single-step Amplatz dilatation followed by the use of a modified laparoscope trocar 36 Fr as an access sheath with a side screw for suction and group 2 (control group) underwent standard PCNL. The preoperative evaluation of all patients included a comprehensive clinical evaluation, a normal X-ray of the kidney-ureter-bladder, and a computed tomography scan of the abdomen without contrast, and laboratory investigations. Data regarding the perioperative period were documented. Results: A significant difference was observed in the operative and puncture times between both groups, with Group 1 (the novel group) demonstrating shorter operative and puncture times than those of Group 2 (control group) ( Conclusions: We have developed a novel method for the safe and effective construction of PCNL tracks in the presence of large renal stones. The novel technique, when compared to the standard PCNL, had shorter operative time, puncture time, hospital stay, and less postoperative complications, with a higher satisfaction rate.

Indexed as

Modificationnovel techniquepercutaneous nephrolithotomyrenal tractstaghorn stones

Identifiers

PMID41696614
PMCPMC12904504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.