Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696610›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Early or late intervention of upper urinary tract stone disease: What dictates it?

Murat Tuğrul Eren, Hakan Özveri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat Tuğrul ErenDepartment of Urology, Vocabulary School of Health Sciences, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Kozyatagi Hospital, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hakan ÖzveriDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Kozyatagi Hospital, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Urolithiasis is a multifactorial disease that causes symptomatology and needs to be managed depending on various clinical parameters. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical factors for early operation in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 148 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URS) within 6 weeks of diagnosis of urolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those operated early (≤3 days, Results: 110 (74.3%) males and 38 (25.7%) females with a median age of 38 years were operated on for uncomplicated ureteral stones. Median time from diagnosis to ureteroscopic intervention was 3 days. Among clinical factors, only the number of readmissions to the emergency room, the mean white blood cell count, the level of microscopic hematuria, and VAS scores of pain at the initial diagnosis were significantly higher in the early operated group ( Conclusions: Pain is a major clinical factor resulting in earlier URS in uncomplicated upper urinary tract stone disease. First admission to the emergency room due to renal colic with multiple readmissions after diagnosis, high level of microscopic hematuria, and white blood cell counts appear to be significant pain-related factors for earlier operation.

Indexed as

Endourologykidney stone diseasepainureterorenoscopy

Identifiers

PMID41696610
PMCPMC12904502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.