ArticleVirus evolution2026
Deletion detection in SARS-CoV-2 genomes from COVID-19 patients: elimination of false positives.
Article in Virus evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid and precise amplicon-based genome sequencing to preparedness and response chikungunya virus outbreaks.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deletions are prevalent in the genomes of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from COVID-19 patients, but their roles in the severity, transmission, and persistence of disease are poorly understood. Millions of COVID-19 swab samples from patients have been sequenced and made available online, offering an unprecedented opportunity to study such deletions. Multiplex-PCR sequencing (amplicon-seq) has been the most widely used method for sequencing clinical COVID-19 samples. However, through experiments with negative control samples and existing bioinformatics methods, we find that this protocol introduces large numbers of false-positive deletions. These false positives commonly occur in short alignments, at low frequency and depth, and near primer binding sites used for whole-genome amplification. To address this issue, we developed a filtering strategy, validated with positive control samples containing a known deletion. Our strategy accurately detected the known deletion and removed >99% of false positives in Illumina short-read data from ARTIC amplicon sequencing protocols. This method, applied to public COVID-19 swab data, revealed that deletions occurring independently of transcription regulatory sequences were ~20-fold less common than previously reported; however, they remain more frequent in symptomatic patients. Our optimized approach should enhance the reliability of SARS-CoV-2 deletion characterization from surveillance studies. Finally, our approach may guide the development of bioinformatics pipelines for genome sequence analyses of other viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.