ArticleTobacco induced diseases2026
The dilemma of coordinated communication in China's e-cigarette governance: A computational discourse analysis of a social media controversy.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmid increasingly stringent e-cigarette regulations in China - including taxation, flavor bans, and advertising restrictions - coordinated communication has emerged as a key challenge in tobacco control. This study investigates a viral incident involving Blackpink's Jennie to explore how failures in strategic narrative coordination have undermined the legitimacy of regulatory efforts.
methodsThis study combined web scraping, large language models (LLMs) topic modeling, and critical discourse analysis (CDA) to collect and analyze an e-cigarette-related event on the Chinese social media platform Weibo from July to October 2024.
resultsFindings reveal that although e-cigarette-related content was widely circulated, public discourse largely lacked critical health framing. Instead, discussions often shifted toward moral judgments, cultural identity, and individual freedoms. This discursive vacuum weakened the normative foundation of tobacco control and enabled counter-narratives that questioned the state's regulatory intent.
conclusionsThe study introduces 'coordinated communication' as both an analytical framework and a practical imperative for effective tobacco governance. Our Research argues that legal regulation must be accompanied by proactive narrative leadership to sustain public health legitimacy. A multi-stakeholder governance mechanism involving health authorities, media institutions, and digital platforms is recommended to rebuild a coherent, health-centered public discourse in the digital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.