In one paragraphArticle in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Antoine GuiguetNaturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Diversity, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan https://ror.org/00ktqrd38.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3101-825X Erik J van NieukerkenNaturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Diversity, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan https://ror.org/00ktqrd38.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-1840 David GironInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, CNRS UMR 7261, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France Center for Frontier Natural History, Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan https://ror.org/00ktqrd38.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-0983 Barbara GravendeelNaturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Diversity, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan https://ror.org/00ktqrd38.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-0895 Carlos Lopez-VaamondeInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, CNRS UMR 7261, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France Center for Frontier Natural History, Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan https://ror.org/00ktqrd38.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-2368 Issei OhshimaLaboratory of Insect Evolution and Diversity, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Sakyo, Kyoto Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, CNRS UMR 7261, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques Tours France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-9749 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
New Caledonia is a biodiversity hotspot with high levels of micro-endemism, yet its gracillariid fauna remains poorly documented. Here, two new species of
Indexed as
AustraliaDNA barcodingendemismfrass disposalhost plant usesympatrytaxonomy
Identifiers
PMID41696483
PMCPMC12895181
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390