ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
A descriptive qualitative study of pregnancy experiences, care and decision-making amongst South African adolescent girls and young women.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) remains a key public health concern, shaped by wider socio-cultural and structural factors. Although global birth rates among adolescent girls are declining, South Africa's rates continue to rise. This study examined AGYW's attitudes, experiences with pregnancy and antenatal care, and views on accessing related services. Methods: The study employed a descriptive qualitative design, using in-depth interviews to explore the experiences of AGYW aged 15-24 years from seven South African provinces, regardless of pregnancy history. Participants were selected from the HERStory 3 survey database and interviewed remotely by telephone, with sixty-eight participants. Interviews were transcribed and translated into English. Data analysis followed an integrated, cyclical thematic approach that identified themes through deductive and inductive methods to identify and define themes, patterns, and relationships. Results: The study identified four main themes: support during pregnancy, mental health, health service experiences, and social or cultural factors affecting pregnancy experiences. Family, particularly parents, played a major role in the pregnancy experiences of AGYW, but limited partner communication and difficulty confiding in families often weakened support networks. Participants reported issues, like premature birth and miscarriage, highlighting a need for postpartum care. Experiences with health services were mixed, with some unaware of available programs. Decisions about abortion involved financial, educational, health, and moral considerations. Conclusions: This study examined AGYW's experiences of pregnancy and pregnancy-related services. Findings suggest that SRH services for AGYW in high-risk communities can be improved by training support professionals to be more sensitive and non-judgmental.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.