ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Failed Seroconversion in the Management of Potential Lyssavirus Exposures.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although failure of rabies postexposure prophylaxis is rare, several factors, including improper vaccine or rabies immunoglobulin administration, may increase the risk. Where there is the potential for postexposure prophylaxis failure, public health units may recommend serology to confirm a therapeutic immune response. This study evaluates which factors increase the risk of failed seroconversion in cases where serology was indicated after rabies postexposure prophylaxis. Methods: Potential lyssavirus exposure notifications where serology was collected were identified from 5 Southeast Queensland public health units from June 2015 to December 2022. Data on the indication and outcome of serology were extracted from public health case notes. Descriptive analysis was performed comparing serology outcomes by demographic and PEP course characteristics. Modeling for identified risk factors was conducted using hierarchical selection logistic regression analysis. Results: One hundred eighty-one potential exposures were included in the study. Giving a rabies vaccine in the wrong site (relative risk [RR], 10.8; 95% CI, 2.6-36.4) or a vaccine into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin (RR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9-16.9) increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after adjusting for age and serology indication. Age ≥65 also increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after controlling for administration errors (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.3-11.7). Conclusions: Administering rabies vaccine into an incorrect site or into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin increases the risk of failed seroconversion. In such cases, we recommend that the risk is sufficient to invalidate the dose and immediately repeat it without serology. Older age may be an independent risk factor for failed seroconversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.