ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Impact of external oblique intercostal plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing of Fascial Plane Blocks in Bariatric Surgery: Pre-Incision Administration Is Associated with Lower Early Pain and Opioid Consumption.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Response to comments on "Impact of external oblique intercostal plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Impact of external oblique intercostal plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Regional research impact strengthening the national academics in geographical diversities.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of the external oblique intercostal plane block for postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is effective for treating obesity but frequently causes significant postoperative pain. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the external oblique intercostal plane block (EOIB) in reducing pain, opioid use, and adverse effects after LSG. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered review (CRD420251072075) searched seven major databases for comparative studies of EOIB versus placebo or other analgesic techniques in adults undergoing LSG. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 6, 12, and 24 h. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) in the first 24 h, time to first rescue analgesia, complications or side effects like incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and block related adverse events. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via I². Results: Four randomised controlled trials ( Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that EOIB is a promising analgesic technique for patients undergoing LSG. It effectively reduces early postoperative pain and overall opioid consumption in the first 24 h. While no block-related complications were reported, larger, multicenter trials are necessary to confirm its efficacy, establish a definitive safety profile, and determine its role in multimodal pain management for bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.