ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Simulation-based training for fascial plane blocks: A scoping review mapped to the Kirkpatrick evaluation framework.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional research impact strengthening the national academics in geographical diversities.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fascial plane blocks are integral components of multimodal analgesia, and ultrasound guidance improves the precision and safety. Simulation-based training is a promising approach to improvise procedural performance. However, evidence suggesting translation to patient-level outcomes is limited. This scoping review aimed to explore the available evidence on the impact of simulation based training for fascial plane blocks, mapping outcomes to the Kirkpatrick (KP) evaluation framework. A systematic search was conducted per PRISMA-ScR guidelines from standard databases. Eligible studies involved physicians, residents, or certified registered nurses from anaesthesiology and emergency medicine undergoing simulation-based fascial plane block training. Data were extracted on study characteristics, training modalities and duration, block type, assessment tools, feedback from participants, and outcomes. Fourteen pre-/post-interventional studies involving 458 participants were included. Most interventions combined didactic sessions, video demonstrations, and simulation-based training using commercial or custom models. Transversus abdominis plane, serratus anterior plane, erector spinae plane, and fascia iliaca compartment blocks were studied. Outcomes assessment predominately targeted lower KP levels, focussing on learners' confidence, knowledge, or improved performance in the simulated or clinical environment, immediate post-training. Long-term follow-up was limited, with most evaluations conducted within 3 months of training. Patient-centred outcomes such as complication, infection rate, or patient satisfaction were rarely assessed. Future research should employ validated assessment tools, isolate the impact of simulation from other modalities, and evaluate higher KP levels, including patient outcomes and system-level changes, to establish its true clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.