Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696367›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Fascia iliaca compartment block: A narrative review.

Nidhi Bhatia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nidhi BhatiaProfessor, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-5084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a plane block, targeting the three main branches of the lumbar plexus, including the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and obturator nerve. It is a useful regional anaesthesia technique for lower limb procedures, particularly for hip and knee surgeries. While both traditional landmark-based and newer ultrasound-guided approaches exist, the latter offers more reliable coverage of the target nerves. Through this narrative review, we wish to bring forth the anatomical considerations that need to be kept in mind, as well as the indications and contraindications of administering an ultrasound-guided FICB. The review describes in detail the two main approaches of ultrasound-guided FICB, including the infrainguinal and suprainguinal approaches, with emphasis on the fact that the suprainguinal approach provides a more extensive spread of local anaesthetic (LA), a more reliable blockade of the obturator nerve, greater pain relief, and reduced opioid consumption. Further, being a plane block, a large volume of LA needs to be administered for adequate effect. To conclude, ultrasound-guided FICB is a superficial, safe, and easy-to-learn block with a low complication rate.

Indexed as

Fascia iliaca compartment blockinfrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment blocknarrative reviewsuprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment blockultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID41696367
PMCPMC12900194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.