ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
A narrative review on fascial plane blocks - Part A: Anatomical foundations and mechanistic insights.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Fascial Plane Blocks in Perioperative and Pain Medicine: From Mechanisms to Emerging Multitarget Interfascial Strategies.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have transformed perioperative analgesia by shifting attention from individual nerves to the complex architecture of fascia and its dynamic role in nociceptive modulation. Despite widespread use, their anatomical foundations, mechanisms of action, and factors influencing injectate spread remain incompletely understood, contributing to inconsistent clinical performance. This manuscript of our two-part review provides a comprehensive, anatomy-driven framework that clarifies the structural diversity of fascial planes, their intrinsic neural components, and the evolving consensus on terminology and classification. Drawing on cadaveric, radiological, and clinical evidence, we dissect the mechanisms that allow FPBs to achieve analgesia-ranging from local fascial modulation and paraneural diffusion to systemic effects-and outline the determinants that shape injectate distribution, including fascial barriers, tissue compliance, patient positioning, and hydrostatic forces. A detailed analysis of interregional nomenclature, unified classification schemes, and persistent knowledge gaps highlights the need for standardisation and mechanistic clarity. Together, these foundational concepts establish the anatomical and physiological bases upon which clinical applications are optimised, enabling a more precise, evidence-based selection and execution of FPBs across surgical and emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.