Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696366›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

A narrative review on fascial plane blocks - Part A: Anatomical foundations and mechanistic insights.

Santosh K Sharma, Kartik Sonawane, Tuhin Mistry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santosh K SharmaProfessor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-8626
Kartik SonawaneConsultant, Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-5505
Tuhin MistryConsultant, Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-4831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have transformed perioperative analgesia by shifting attention from individual nerves to the complex architecture of fascia and its dynamic role in nociceptive modulation. Despite widespread use, their anatomical foundations, mechanisms of action, and factors influencing injectate spread remain incompletely understood, contributing to inconsistent clinical performance. This manuscript of our two-part review provides a comprehensive, anatomy-driven framework that clarifies the structural diversity of fascial planes, their intrinsic neural components, and the evolving consensus on terminology and classification. Drawing on cadaveric, radiological, and clinical evidence, we dissect the mechanisms that allow FPBs to achieve analgesia-ranging from local fascial modulation and paraneural diffusion to systemic effects-and outline the determinants that shape injectate distribution, including fascial barriers, tissue compliance, patient positioning, and hydrostatic forces. A detailed analysis of interregional nomenclature, unified classification schemes, and persistent knowledge gaps highlights the need for standardisation and mechanistic clarity. Together, these foundational concepts establish the anatomical and physiological bases upon which clinical applications are optimised, enabling a more precise, evidence-based selection and execution of FPBs across surgical and emergency settings.

Indexed as

Analgesiaenhanced recovery after surgeryfasciainnervationnerve blocknociceptorspainregional anaesthesiaultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41696366
PMCPMC12900225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.