Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696365›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Fascial plane blocks in children: Mechanisms, indications, controversies, and practical guidance: A narrative review.

Amrita Rath, Vrushali Ponde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amrita RathAssociate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-2667
Vrushali PondeConsultant, Children's Anaesthesia Services, Surya Children Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-7240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascial plane blocks in children are defined as the administration of local anaesthetic into myofascial or aponeurotic planes to reach nerves traversing these planes. They have expanded rapidly from adult practice to paediatrics, with reported benefits across thoracic, abdominal, and lower-extremity surgery. Paediatric evidence now includes narrative reviews, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses; however, variability in nomenclature, dosing, and spread, and inconsistent comparators (caudal/neuraxial vs peripheral) continue to fuel controversy. This review synthesises current paediatric data on thoracic block like serratus anterior plane block, erector spinae plane block, abdominal-like rectus sheath block, transversus abdominal plane block, quadratus lumborum block, and lower-extremity (fascia iliaca, adductor canal) blocks. It highlights paediatric anatomical and physiological considerations and appraises safety (including local anaesthetic systemic toxicity) and catheter techniques. The review also maps limitations and research priorities.

Indexed as

Analgesiaerector spinae plane blockfascial plane blockslocal anaestheticpostoperative analgesiaquadratus lumborum blockregional anaesthesiaserratus anterior plane blocktransverse abdominis planeultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41696365
PMCPMC12900199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.