Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696260›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Comparing the Nitration of Nanostructured CNF and Other Cellulose Forms for Energetic Applications.

Ana Carolina Marotti Dias, Cesar Liberato Petzhold, Leena Pitkänen, Maurício Ferrapontoff Lemos, Fernando Cunha Peixoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Carolina Marotti DiasSeção de Engenharia Química, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, 22290-270 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-671X
Cesar Liberato PetzholdInstituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-8133
Leena PitkänenDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16300, 00076 Aalto, Finland.
Maurício Ferrapontoff LemosInstituto de Pesquisas da Marinha, Grupo de Materiais, Rua Ipiru, s/n, 21931-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-9135
Fernando Cunha PeixotoSeção de Engenharia Química, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, 22290-270 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1506-9548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work focuses on the nitration of nanocellulose to obtain products with potential advantages over traditional ones obtained from linter cellulose (LC). The material used was a sample of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) commercially available as an aqueous suspension with a 3% solid content. The main objective of the research was to develop the reaction conditions for nitration, including the preparatory methods for the cellulose raw material, so that the properties on the nanometric scale were maintained. The dehydration of the CNF to concentrate the fibrils in suspension was investigated using different methods: gravity and vacuum filtration, centrifugation, oven, and freeze-drying. The nitration experiments were carried out with dehydrated CNF following a protocol based on methodologies reported in the literature. For comparative purposes, commercial samples of cotton LC and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) were also evaluated. A complete characterization of the structural and thermal properties of the cellulose materials and their nitration products was carried out using the following techniques: size-exclusion chromatography, scanning electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis, and elemental analysis. The results of the analysis revealed that the chemical structure of the cellulose chains is neither altered by the removal of water nor by the temperature and pressure conditions. However, the agglomeration of the fibrils is favored due to the interconversion of hydrogen bonds between cellulose-water and cellulose-cellulose, as in the heating and freezing treatments, making the redispersion of the nanofibers impossible. Only dehydration by vacuum filtration was suitable for preparing CNF for the reaction to obtain nitrocellulose. Although the resulting degree of substitution was not yet suitable for energetic applications, it was possible to obtain nitrated products from the commercial cellulosic materials under study. Comparing the structural and thermal properties of the nitrated CNF with those of LC and MCC nitration products obtained under identical conditions, the results corroborated the work in the literature and the theories developed so far. Therefore, the study demonstrated the potential viability of the synthesis methodology developed for the nitration of cellulose of different origins, dimensions, and morphological types.

Identifiers

PMID41696260
PMCPMC12902859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.