ArticleACS omega2026
Spectronaut and DIA-NN: A Comparison of their Performance in the Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Biopsies.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct data-independent acquisition (DIA) in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has developed into a powerful methodology for proteomics. Herein, we directly compare the performance of two widely used DIA computational platformsSpectronaut and DIA-NNusing paired tumor and peritumor tissue biopsies from human lung carcinoma (LUAD) patients, samples that one would encounter in a clinical research lab in a hospital setting. The evaluations include the following: (1) protein identification depth, (2) quantitative consistency, and (3) differential expression on the same set of LC-MS/MS runs, using nominally identical computational parameters and settings. Both Spectronaut and DIA-NN identified ∼>7600 proteins in the LUAD samples, with 7180 proteins common to both platforms. Spectronaut reported 1250 upregulated proteins and 266 downregulated proteins (tumor versus peritumor), while DIA-NN reported 1819 and 174 proteins, respectively. A total of 1130 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were common to both platforms. Of the top 50 DEPs, 34 were shared between Spectronaut and DIA-NN. Two of these DEPsHSPA5 and CAV1were also among the top 50 proteins showing the highest degrees of protein-protein interaction. The DEPs enabled classification of the LUAD patients into three subtypes; the clinical validity of the current subtypes will need to be substantiated in the future with additional LUAD samples and experimentation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.