ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture on pelvic floor function in women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized sham-controlled trial protocol.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition among adult women, significantly impairing quality of life. Patients with SUI often exhibit abnormal pelvic floor muscle function, which can be comprehensively assessed using surface electromyography (sEMG) and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Electroacupuncture (EA) is an effective treatment for SUI, and multiple studies have confirmed its clinical efficacy; however, objective evidence regarding its impact on pelvic floor muscle function remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of EA applied to lower abdominal acupoints for SUI and to explore its impact on pelvic floor function, thereby providing mechanistic insights into EA's therapeutic effect on mild to moderate SUI. Methods: This is a randomized, single-blind trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 64 participants will be enrolled. Following screening, eligible female patients with SUI will be randomly allocated to either the EA group ( Conclusion: By comprehensively evaluating symptom improvement, temporal effects, and pelvic floor functional changes following EA treatment for SUI, this study aims to systematically elucidate the therapeutic effects of EA and its mechanism of action on the pelvic floor. The findings are expected to provide robust evidence to support the clinical application of EA for SUI. Clinical Trial Registration: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/mgt/project/view/-6004709097458762939, identifier ITMCTR2024000151.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.